{"id":57479,"date":"2026-07-05T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-07-05T11:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/latinoamerica21.com\/?p=57479"},"modified":"2026-07-05T22:22:58","modified_gmt":"2026-07-06T01:22:58","slug":"the-wounds-that-never-fade-memory-colonialism-and-identity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/latinoamerica21.com\/en\/the-wounds-that-never-fade-memory-colonialism-and-identity\/","title":{"rendered":"The wounds that never fade: Memory, colonialism, and identity"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If Latin America had to summarize its collective memory in three images, which would it choose? A recent study by the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.insrc.in\/\">Social Research Center (SRC)<\/a>, conducted with experts from across the region, offers a revealing answer. Among the most important historical references for understanding Latin American identity are the Falkland Islands (Malvinas), the Conquest, and the Panama Canal. At first glance, the selection seems unusual: a twentieth-century territorial conflict, a process that began more than five hundred years ago, and an infrastructure project transformed into a geopolitical symbol. Yet, when viewed together, these three elements tell a common story: they are not merely about the past\u2014they are about power.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Collective memory is never simply an accumulation of recollections. As historian Pierre Nora argued, societies preserve certain events because they become <em>sites of memory<\/em>: physical or symbolic spaces where a community deposits its most fundamental questions about itself. What a society chooses to remember says as much about its present as it does about its history.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"190\" src=\"https:\/\/latinoamerica21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/L21-Banner-INGLES-1024x190.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-50869\" srcset=\"https:\/\/latinoamerica21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/L21-Banner-INGLES-1024x190.png 1024w, https:\/\/latinoamerica21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/L21-Banner-INGLES-300x56.png 300w, https:\/\/latinoamerica21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/L21-Banner-INGLES-768x142.png 768w, https:\/\/latinoamerica21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/L21-Banner-INGLES-1536x284.png 1536w, https:\/\/latinoamerica21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/L21-Banner-INGLES-2048x379.png 2048w, https:\/\/latinoamerica21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/L21-Banner-INGLES-150x28.png 150w, https:\/\/latinoamerica21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/L21-Banner-INGLES-696x129.png 696w, https:\/\/latinoamerica21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/L21-Banner-INGLES-1068x198.png 1068w, https:\/\/latinoamerica21.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/L21-Banner-INGLES-1920x356.png 1920w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the Latin American case, the findings suggest that much of the region\u2019s identity continues to be organized around three major concerns: sovereignty, the colonial experience, and relations with external powers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It is no coincidence that the Falkland Islands (Malvinas) continue to occupy a central place in the region\u2019s collective imagination. Beyond the territorial dispute between Argentina and the United Kingdom, the archipelago has become a broader symbol: the idea of incomplete sovereignty and of a region that is still debating the limits of its autonomy in relation to external powers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The enduring presence of the Falklands (Malvinas) in Latin American memory demonstrates that certain conflicts survive because they represent something greater than the territory under dispute. A similar dynamic can be observed with the Panama Canal. Although it is often analyzed through the lens of economics or international trade, for many Latin Americans its significance extends far beyond engineering and logistics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The canal embodies longstanding debates over strategic control, foreign influence, and the capacity to make decisions about resources regarded as fundamental to the region. Even today, as tensions between the United States and China reshape the global geopolitical landscape, Panama continues to emerge as a space where international interests intersect with aspirations for regional sovereignty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The inclusion of the Conquest among the region\u2019s principal historical reference points is equally significant. More than five centuries later, the colonial process continues to serve as a key framework for understanding contemporary inequalities, power structures, and cultural tensions. This is not simply about remembering a historical event. It is about recognizing that many of the questions that continue to shape Latin America\u2014who has access to power, who defines national narratives, which cultures are made visible and which remain marginalized\u2014find part of their answers in that founding process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">At this point, it is impossible not to recall An\u00edbal Quijano\u2019s reflections on the \u201ccoloniality of power.\u201d For the Peruvian sociologist, political independence did not necessarily eliminate the hierarchies established during the colonial era. Many of them endured, transformed into economic, social, and cultural structures that continue to shape the region. Perhaps this is why the Conquest remains at the center of debates about Latin American identity: because its consequences do not belong exclusively to the past.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The study also reveals another noteworthy finding. When experts were asked about the preservation of Indigenous peoples\u2019 historical memory, the primary reference identified was the Tahuantinsuyo, or Inca Empire. This suggests that Indigenous memories are occupying an increasingly visible place within regional narratives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Alongside historical narratives centered exclusively on the colonial or republican experience, there is a growing recognition of histories that predate European arrival and of alternative ways of understanding territory, community, and power.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">All of this is unfolding at a time when Latin America faces challenges that, in theory, should shift attention toward the future: artificial intelligence, the energy transition, the climate crisis, geopolitical realignment, and the transformation of work. Yet the findings show that the region continues to seek answers in historical symbols associated with sovereignty, dependency, and cultural identity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Far from signaling stagnation, this may instead be understood as evidence that memory serves a fundamental political function. As sociologist Elizabeth Jelin has argued, societies do not remember in order to preserve the past intact; they remember in order to interpret the present and envision the future.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Perhaps that is the study\u2019s most important lesson. The wounds that endure in Latin American memory do not survive because of nostalgia. They remain because they continue to offer essential insights into debates that the region has yet to resolve.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Memory, after all, is not an archive. It is a way of seeing the world.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Latin American identity continues to bear the marks of colonialism, sovereignty, and the power struggles that still shape its present.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":923,"featured_media":57477,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"episode_type":"","audio_file":"","podmotor_file_id":"","podmotor_episode_id":"","cover_image":"","cover_image_id":"","duration":"","filesize":"","filesize_raw":"","date_recorded":"","explicit":"","block":"","itunes_episode_number":"","itunes_title":"","itunes_season_number":"","itunes_episode_type":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[16839,17162],"tags":[15635],"gps":[],"class_list":["post-57479","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-historia-en","category-sociedad-en","tag-debates"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/latinoamerica21.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57479","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/latinoamerica21.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/latinoamerica21.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/latinoamerica21.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/923"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/latinoamerica21.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57479"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/latinoamerica21.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57479\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57481,"href":"https:\/\/latinoamerica21.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57479\/revisions\/57481"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/latinoamerica21.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/57477"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/latinoamerica21.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57479"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/latinoamerica21.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57479"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/latinoamerica21.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57479"},{"taxonomy":"gps","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/latinoamerica21.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/gps?post=57479"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}