Green capitalism presents itself as a way out of the climate crisis, yet it risks recycling—under a different language—the same inequalities and dependencies as always.

In the era of climate emergency, state aid is no longer allocated according to the damage suffered, but according to who is suffering—revealing how political and racial prejudices determine who is deemed worthy of assistance.

Between broken promises and the weight of the fossil fuel lobby, COP30 once again revealed the gap between climate urgency and the political will to leave oil behind.

Held in the Amazon, COP30 placed at the center of the climate debate a key and long-postponed question: inequality in access to information as a factor that deepens the vulnerability of the communities most affected by the climate crisis.

Brazil’s and Uruguay’s oil bets reveal the tensions between their climate rhetoric and a development model that still prioritizes fossil fuels despite the environmental urgency.

The climate crisis is hitting Latin America with disproportionate force, revealing a region that is increasingly vulnerable and a world that is failing to keep its own promises.