From 1970 to 2025, 25 former Latin American presidents were subjected to judicial proceedings. What does this toxic relationship between the exercise of power and compliance with the rules demonstrate? Are there possible solutions?

The election of judges in Mexico marks an unprecedented turn in justice: it questions the limits of the division of powers and opens a debate on judicial autonomy, sovereignty and populism in Latin America.

Electoral autocracies perfect judicial control through disciplinary bodies that, far from guaranteeing justice, stifle the independence of judges.

Javier Milei has ruled by controversial decrees and, in the midst of “Cryptogate”, has sought to consolidate his power in the judiciary, thus eroding Argentina's democracy.

The Royal Spanish Academy defines "tómbola" as a "public raffle of various objects, generally as a fairground business or for charitable purposes." In other...

Through the “popular election” of judges the ruling party reserves the task of selecting candidates, hence securing the absence of judicial oversight over its decisions and actions.