Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Studies at the School of Government, University of Chile, and Associate Researcher at the Center for Studies of Conflict and Social Cohesion (COES).
The Chilean social outbreak of 2019 was the result of an accumulation of frustrations over unfulfilled expectations, a lack of institutional adaptation, and a growing disconnect between citizens and the state.
Co-author Nicolás Selamé
Although until a few months ago it was taken for granted that this consultation would yield a favorable result to the Convention's proposal, today the panorama has changed: different pollsters point to an advance in favor of rejection.
Until a few years ago, Chilean politics was predictable. But after the mobilizations of 2019, volatility has become present in such a way that, a few days before the elections, any prognosis on who will compete in a second round (particularly who will occupy the second place) is risky.
On October 25, Chile will face its most important election since 1988, when a plebiscite began the transition to democracy. After the 2019 crisis, in 2020 the citizens will again be able to decide whether to initiate a process to replace the constitution inherited from the Pinochet regime and the type of convention that will have to draft it.