The debate over social media and childhood is no longer theoretical: in Latin America, a political consensus to regulate platforms is beginning to take shape.

Brazil, an emblem of sociability and joy, today faces a troubling paradox: millions of people live with a persistent loneliness that erodes social bonds.

With radical changes in climate, our habits, perceptions, and reactions to the causes should change. But is that what public opinion data tell us?

There are many challenges in integrating artificial intelligence into institutional processes and political engineering, and there is no consensus on its advantages. This double reading will condition innovations and fuel demands for external regulation.

The last twelve months have seen a deactivation of demonstrations and popular participation in Brazil that came as a surprise at least until Sunday, February 25, when Bolsonaro called on his supporters to show their mobilizing strength. How do we interpret the absence of mobilizations in the streets?

If partisan sympathies or antipathies regulate affections and stiffen worldviews, models of society and prognoses about the future in such opposing ways, it should come as no surprise that every aspect of life becomes a trench.

Latin America will hold six presidential elections in 2024. Along with the votes comes the effort to measure them through polls and to confuse and disorient voters through fake polls that fabricate results intending to shape the electoral mood of citizens.

Recently, rejoicing at the errors in the predictions of voting intention polls is a trend.

In an adverse context for declaring preferences, the OAS report objected to the pollsters' work after their projections turned out to be far from the results.

It is urgent to move towards a net zero emissions agenda by 2050 based on public policies that impact society on a large scale.